[gpfsug-discuss] GPL compilation failure
Ryan Novosielski
novosirj at rutgers.edu
Thu Aug 17 17:53:41 BST 2023
Sorry, one more thing: while you can often upgrade from say 3.10.0-1160.92.1 to 3.10.0-1160.95.1, like the kind of upgrade you’d see within an RHEL point release — and you’ll often see an older version get updated to list support for those kinds of version increments — you should definitely expect to potentially need to upgrade GPFS if you’re going between RHEL point releases, like 8.7 to 8.8 — those ones that change from, say, 4.18.0-425.x to 4.18.0-477.x.
Sometimes unsupported versions will work, but often times they will not, and if you have a support contract, that difference is sort of meaningless since you wouldn’t want to run an unsupported version anyway.
On Aug 17, 2023, at 12:38, Ryan Novosielski <novosirj at rutgers.edu> wrote:
Not supported on that GPFS version; probably need a 5.1.8.x — definitely supported on 5.1.8.1.
Always check here before upgrading the kernel:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/storage-scale?topic=STXKQY/gpfsclustersfaq.html
--
#BlackLivesMatter
____
|| \\UTGERS, |---------------------------*O*---------------------------
||_// the State | Ryan Novosielski - novosirj at rutgers.edu
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus
|| \\ of NJ | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB A555B, Newark
`'
On Aug 17, 2023, at 11:54, Uwe Falke <uwe.falke at kit.edu> wrote:
Hi, just to let you know:
building the 5.1.7.1 GPL layer for Linux Kernel 4.18.0-477.21.1.el8_8.x86_64 failed for me:
[...]
In file included from /usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cfiles.c:87,
from /usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cfiles_cust.c:54:
/usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cxiCache.c: In function 'pcache_nfs_have_rdirplus':
/usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cxiCache.c:4011:31: error: 'NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'NFS_INO_ODIRECT'?
&& test_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_I(inodeP)->flags)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NFS_INO_ODIRECT
/usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cxiCache.c:4011:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
[...]
If anyone managed to build that, a message would be nice, else you should expect problems.
I opened a case with IBM but it is caught in the call entry ... (SF TS013920636, in case any supporter wants to look after it).
Uwe
--
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC)
Scientific Data Management (SDM)
Uwe Falke
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Building 442, Room 187
D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
Tel: +49 721 608 28024
Email: uwe.falke at kit.edu<mailto:uwe.falke at kit.edu>
www.scc.kit.edu<http://www.scc.kit.edu/>
Registered office:
Kaiserstraße 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20230817/ba186bae/attachment.htm>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list