[gpfsug-discuss] storage-scale-object
Christoph Martin
martin at uni-mainz.de
Wed Feb 28 16:23:36 GMT 2024
Hi Daniel,
Am 28.02.24 um 17:06 schrieb Kidger, Daniel:
> I would assume it is because most customers want to use the S3 Interface rather than the Swift one?
And Openstack/Swift is very complex. So I can understand why IBM gets
rid of it.
But 5.1.9.1 has no object support at all. There is no S3 interface.
Christoph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20240228/3852e216/attachment.sig>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list